Drawing for FALL IN LOVE WITH FOOD AGAIN

USPTO serial 86121563

FALL IN LOVE WITH FOOD AGAIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FALL IN LOVE WITH FOOD AGAIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Bagarazzi

JAMES M. BAGARAZZI DORITY & MANNING, P.A.PO BOX 1449GREENVILLE, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Food concentrate supplements, dietary supplements and nutritional supplements, namely, dehydrated vegetable juice powders containing barley, beet and/or carrot for non-alcoholic beverages when mixed with waterACTIVE—
035Wholesale distributorship and retail store services featuring DVDs, CDs, books, freshly extracted fruit juices, vegetable juices, vegetable smoothies, food supplements, prepackaged snacks, prepackaged whole foods, prepackaged fruit and nut bars, juicers, water distillers, food dehydrators, health and beauty products, personal care productsACTIVE—
044Providing a website featuring non-downloadable electronic media, multimedia content, and audio content, namely, videos, pictures, images, text, photos, and information regarding health, nutrition and diet via the Internet and other communications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 9, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 7, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 9, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 17, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 28, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 23, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 20, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 25, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 17, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 13, 2014PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 31, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 5, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 6, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance