USPTO serial 86121715
STRATUS ANALYTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STRATUS ANALYTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Rodgers Lunsford III
J. RODGERS LUNSFORD III SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP1230 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 3100ATLANTA, GA 30309-3592UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Analytical computer software for use in analyzing and evaluating the potential return and the risk characteristics associated with an aircraft-related investment, the acquisition, financing, and disposition of aircraft, whether aircraft should be leased or purchased, and in analyzing historical return and risk characteristics of aircraft selection, aircraft investment structuring, and aircraft risk diversification alternatives applied retrospectively to the historical world aircraft fleet | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Consultation services in the field of procurement, namely, purchasing for others aircraft, aviation, and transportation equipment in the nature of airframes and engines; Aircraft, aviation, and transportation related acquisition and merger consultation; Aircraft, aviation, and transportation equipment business management, planning, and supervision consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Consultation services in the field of aircraft, aviation, and transportation related financing services, namely, project financings, asset backed financings, leveraged leases, sale leasebacks, leased asset portfolio, and secured debt financings; Consultation in the field of aircraft, aviation, and transportation related individual asset acquisitions, management, integration, development, and sales; Consultation services in the field of aircraft, aviation, and transportation related corporate debt and equity; Aircraft, aviation, and transportation related investment banking and financing services, namely, asset backed financings, project financings, financing of leveraged leases, sale leasebacks, and leased asset portfolios, individual asset acquisition and management, secured debt financings, and general corporate debt and equity financings; Financial asset management services, namely, financial management of aircraft, aviation, and transportation equipment portfolios and individual assets; Financial investment in the field of aviation, aerospace, and transportation related companies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STRATUS ANALYTICS, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by STRATUS ANALYTICS, LLC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named STRATUS ANALYTICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 1, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |