Drawing for PEPSI FUSION

USPTO serial 86122353

PEPSI FUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOZAK, EVIN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEPSI FUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAUL J. REILLY

JULIE BETH ALBERT BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA44TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10112-4498

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Refrigerated beverage dispensing unitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 6, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 6, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 25, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2015EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Jan 28, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 7, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 7, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 24, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 8, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance