USPTO serial 86122977
FLEX-LOCK FOR A SURE HOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEX-LOCK FOR A SURE HOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LaSalle, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Lewis
GEORGE W. LEWIS WESTERMAN, HATTORI, DANIELS & ADRIAN, LLP1250 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036-2657UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Suit Hangers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 8, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |