Drawing for SENSILK

USPTO serial 86123575

SENSILK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSILK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jefferson F. Scher

Jefferson Scher Carr & Ferrell LLP120 Constitution DrMenlo Park, CA 94025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and hardware for smartphones, tablet computers, mobile phones, portable media players, handheld computers, connectors and wireless accessories, namely, computer hardware and software used in association with clothing embedded with body sensors for tracking and monitoring environmental and physiological biometric data, that consists of monitoring oximetry, gas analysis, vital signs, blood properties and respiratory events; apparel having sensing system for measuring, monitoring and tracking environmental and physiological biometric properties, namely, wearable, textile based devices in the nature of electric sensors designed to record, analyze and transmit personal information with respect to location-based, physiological and health information, temperature sensors and thermal sensors, global positioning system (GPS) transmitters, heart monitors, oxygen monitors, pulse rate monitors, blood glucose monitors, blood pressure monitorsACTIVE—
042Computer software, namely, online non-downloadable software used to collect, organize, view, interpret, transmit, store and exchange personal information with respect to location-based, environmental and personal health data and safety informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 29, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 9, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 11, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 5, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 2, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2014PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 1, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 19, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance