Drawing for SLEEPERDEEPER

USPTO serial 86123685

SLEEPERDEEPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHIMPF, TIMOTHY O
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SLEEPERDEEPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

RAJ ABHYANKER LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE, P.C.446 E SOUTHERN AVETEMPE, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical instrument, namely, medical devices for preventing potentially harmful radio wave exposure during sleep specially adapted for treating sleep disordersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 2, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 1, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 30, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 17, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 13, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 13, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance