USPTO serial 86123811
TRUCKTOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRUCKTOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JONATHAN D. REICHMAN
JONATHAN D. REICHMAN KENYON & KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture films and prerecorded video tapes and video discs featuring cartoons, dramas, comedies, musicals and stories for children; prerecorded audio tapes and audio discs featuring music and songs and stories for children; audio and video recordings on tapes, cassettes and discs featuring animated action and adventure stories for children; downloadable films and television programs featuring animated action and adventure stories for children provided via video-on-demand service on a global computer network and wireless devices; interactive and virtual reality media and entertainment, educational or communication products featuring animated action and adventure stories for children, namely, computer software containing animated action and adventure stories for children; PDA's and related goods, namely, headphone, battery chargers, protective carrying cases specially adapted for personal digital assistants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |