USPTO serial 86123902
ROYALE TIGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 26, 2019
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 705 means a Madrid-based U.S. registration has accepted Section 71 maintenance and Section 15 incontestability. The U.S. extension is active with strengthened rights. Track next renewal deadlines in TSDR and WIPO records.
Need help with ROYALE TIGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
SAINT JOHN, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
SAINT JOHN, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
SAINT JOHN, NEW BRUNSWICK, CA
Dieppe, New Brunswick, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. Ehard
Andrew S. Ehard MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ Conducting contest programs to promote the sale of absorbent consumer paper products of others; providing incentive award programs for customers through the issuance and processing of loyalty coupons for frequent use of a line of absorbent consumer paper products ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | [ Online social networking services in the field of absorbent consumer paper products via webpage ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by IRVING CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Irving Tissue Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named ROYALE TIGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2026 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 24, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 26, 2026 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |