USPTO serial 86124155
CHAPMAN CRAFTED BEER COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHAPMAN CRAFTED BEER COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Candace L. Moon,
Candace L. Moon, THE CRAFT BEER ATTORNEY5095 MURPHY CANYON RD, STE. 240SAN DIEGO, CA 92123UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | RGTD | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB DECISION REVERSED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 5, 2014 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |