Drawing for MCVEGGIE

USPTO serial 86124358

MCVEGGIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MCVEGGIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Gray

STEVEN GRAY ASHFORD & WRISTON LLLP1099 ALAKEA ST STE 1400HONOLULU, HI 96813-4500UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029combination meal consisting primarily of a meat or vegetable-based entrée and a soup or salad for consumption on or off the premisesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 11, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 11, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 11, 2015OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 22, 2014OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 1, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 21, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance