USPTO serial 86127203
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Highlands Ranch, CO
Las Vegas, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher C. Pike
JACK BARRECA9457 SOUTH UNIVERSITY BLVDSTE 631HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80126| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |