Drawing for ENTITY BEHAVIOR ATTACK TIMELINE

USPTO serial 86127953

ENTITY BEHAVIOR ATTACK TIMELINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENTITY BEHAVIOR ATTACK TIMELINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin S. Costanza

KEVIN S COSTANZA SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVENUESUITE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and hardware used to provide secure access, use and protection of computer networks, directory services, entities and digital data by monitoring and analyzing entity behavior; computer security products, namely, computer peripherals; computer software and computer hardware for detection, blocking, removal and remediation of computer viruses, rootkits, advanced persistent threats, malware, and malicious attacks; computer software for identifying and preventing malicious attacks on computers, computer systems, and digital devices; computer software and hardware providing secure virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments; downloadable databases in the field of statisticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 4, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 4, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 25, 2015EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 17, 2015AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 16, 2015IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Mar 31, 2015AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 31, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 30, 2015EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 30, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 30, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 30, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 30, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 12, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance