USPTO serial 86129844
TOY CIRCUITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOY CIRCUITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Lampel
JUSTIN LAMPEL LAMPEL & ASSOCIATES, P.C.555 SKOKIE BLVD STE 500NORTHBROOK, IL 60062-2845UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Children's educational toys for developing an understanding of electricity; Educational toy for the purpose of the demonstration of alternative energy sources; Electric educational toy used to demonstrate alternative energy sources; Electronic action toys; Electronic educational game machines for children; Electronic learning toys; Electronic novelty toys, namely, toys that electronically record, play back, and distort or manipulate voices and sounds; Electronic toy building blocks that light up as a night light; Electronic toy vehicles; Hobby craft kit comprising circuit boards, wires, transistors, diodes, capacitors, inductors, resistors, power supplies, lights, sirens, and electronic sound emitters; toy kits for teaching children electronics composed of electrical components, namely, plastic color coded wires, transistors, diodes, capacitors, inductors, resistors and power supplies; toy solar energy kits composed of plastic color coded modules for electronic plastic color coded circuits, with DC motors, and photovoltaic solar cell modules for circuit toys; toy plastic propellers used in toy learning kits; toys, namely, remote controlled race cars, hand-held units for playing electronic games, namely, digital roulette games, toy noisemakers, hand-held units for playing electronic games, namely, electronic coin toss games, solar toy race cars, toy space explorer solar vehicles, boats, touch tone controlled toy vehicles, toy helicopters, solar power toy vehicles; electronic toys, namely, toy radio controlled race cars, toy racing cars, toy space explorer solar vehicles, solar energy powered toy cars, toy robots, toy rocket robots, toy turbo robots cars, toy solar powered turbo car robots, toy amphibious solar vehicle robots, toy solar panel robots, toy robotic arms, toy two wheeled vehicle, toy boats, toy racing vehicles, toy rockets, launch platforms for toy rockets, electronic powered toy dinosaurs, toy trains, toy telephones, talking toy clocks, toy radios, toy musical organs, toy electronic musical keyboards; Mechanical toys; Novelty toy items in the nature of educational and entertainment kits comprising circuit boards, wires, transistors, diodes, capacitors, inductors, resistors, power supplies, lights, sirens, and electronic sound emitters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |