USPTO serial 86130224
PEBBLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEBBLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Avis Frazier-Thomas
AVIS FRAZIER-THOMAS WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.4000 WARNER BLVDBLDG. 156N, ROOM 5078BURBANK, CA 91522-0002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of live-action, comedy, drama, animated and reality television series; production of live-action, comedy, drama, animated and reality television series; distribution and display of live-action, comedy, drama and animated motion picture theatrical films; production of live-action, comedy, drama and animated motion picture theatrical films; theatrical performances both animated and live action; internet services providing information via an electronic global computer network in the field of entertainment relating specifically to music, movies, and television; providing current news and entertainment information via a global computer network; educational services, namely, providing on-line interactive children's stories; providing educational demonstrations; organization of exhibitions for educational purposes; providing information relating to educational and entertainment activities and events for children; providing information via an electronic global communications network on the subject of live-action, comedy, drama and animated motion picture films and television programs; and production of live-action, comedy, drama and animated motion picture films for distribution via a global computer network; entertainment services, namely, an ongoing multimedia program series featuring live-action, animated, comedy and drama for distribution via a global computer network; entertainment services, namely, providing computer games online and in mobile wireless form, providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer games, and providing temporary use of non-downloadable video games; production of video and computer game software; provision of information relating to electronic computer games provided via the Internet; providing a website featuring non-downloadable publications in the nature of comic books, strategy guides, fiction books, audio books featuring animated characters, children's books, coloring books, graphic novels, magazines featuring animated characters ; publication of books, comic books, strategy guides, fiction books, audio books, children's books, coloring books, graphic novels, magazines; publishing of electronic publications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2018 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2018 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 31, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 17, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 13, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 14, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |