USPTO serial 86131200
TIGER DOCKS WATERFRONT SPECIALISTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4665888Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 6, 2015
- Examiner
- KHAN, AHSEN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIGER DOCKS WATERFRONT SPECIALISTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
O'Fallon, MO
O'Fallon, MO
O'Fallon, MO
WRIGHT CITY, MO
WRIGHT CITY, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Steiniger
Andrew D. Steiniger BARKLAGE BRETT & HAMILL211 N 3RD STSAINT CHARLES, MO 63301-2812UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Floating metal docks; Metal decking; Metal dock cleats; Metal pontoons and structural supports therefor, used to support decking | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1995 |
| 007 | Marine mounted dock cranes; Mechanical and hydraulic lifts; Mobile dock cranes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1995 |
| 008 | Manually-operated boat lifts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1995 |
| 019 | Concrete retaining walls; Marine products, namely, bumpers or pads for pilings or dock posts; Non-metal decking; Non-metal decks; Non-metal floating docks; Non-metal loading dock shelters; Non-metal pontoons and structural supports therefor, used to support decking | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1995 |
| 020 | Non-metal dock cleats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1995 |
| 037 | Pier construction; Soil erosion control services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1995 |
| 040 | Custom fabrication and production of marine access structures, namely, docks, gangways, piers and marina systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1995 |
| 042 | Custom design and engineering of marine access structures, namely, docks, gangways, piers and marina systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Davis, Marvin C. Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by Davis, Marvin C. Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by Davis, Marvin C. Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by DAVIS, CHRISTINA
- Other trademarks owned by DAVIS, NICHOLAS
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TIGER DOCKS WATERFRONT SPECIALISTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 6, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 30, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2020 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 21, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |