USPTO serial 86131591
CAIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas Thorup
THOMAS THORUP THOMAS MARTIN LLP228 PARK AVENUE SSUITE 300NEW YORK, NY 10003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Bracelets; Broaches; Brooches; Clip earrings; Ear clips; Ear studs; Earrings; Gemstone jewelry; Gold thread jewelry; Hair jewelry in the nature of jewelry for use in the hair; Identification bracelets; Inexpensive non-jewelry watches; Jewelry; Jewelry boxes; Jewelry chains; Jewelry for attachment to clothing; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry in the nature of armbands; Jewelry in the nature of identification tags for wear by humans for decorative purposes; Jewelry pins for use on hats; Jewelry ring holders; Jewelry, namely, amulets; Jewelry, namely, anklets; Jewelry, namely, crosses; Jewelry, namely, dog tags for wear by humans for decorative purposes; Necklace and earring combinations that can be worn separately or as one piece; Necklaces; Plastic bracelets in the nature of jewelry; Rings; Rings being jewelry; Scarf clips being jewelry; Stainless steel jewelry bracelets; Watches and jewelry; Watches, clocks, jewelry and imitation jewelry; Women's jewelry | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |