Drawing for DTOUR

USPTO serial 86131906

DTOUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DTOUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan D. Reichman, Esquire

JONATHAN D. REICHMAN, ESQUIRE ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded video tapes, cassettes and digital video discs containing television programsACTIVE—
038Broadcasting of television programs; Telecommunication services namely, the transmission of television programs by radio waves, satellite, co-axial cable, fibre optic cable, whether encrypted or not; transmission of television programs by radio waves, satellite, co-axial cable and fibre optic cable, to undertakings and to the public for the reception thereof and the retransmission by radio waves, satellite, co-axial cable, or fibre optic cable; operation of a general lifestyle entertainment television station, namely, the broadcast of television programs in the field of lifestyle and travelACTIVE—
041Provision of a website on the Internet featuring entertainment information in the field of lifestyle and travel; creation and production of television programs; television schedulingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 7, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 13, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 11, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 11, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2016CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 23, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2016CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 4, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2015CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 1, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 9, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2015CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 2, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 2, 2014CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 2, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Dec 12, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance