Drawing for TEMPLEBASE

USPTO serial 86134345

TEMPLEBASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHINER, MARK W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEMPLEBASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin Garland

KEVIN GARLAND GARLAND LAW13101 W Washington Blvd, Suite 120Los Angeles, CA 90066UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Digital materials and media, as well as physical products, namely, DVDs, CDs, vinyl, audio recordings, audiovisual recordings, visual recordings, downloadable MP3 files, and downloadable audio and video files featuring music and spoken wordACTIVE—
035Management of performing artists; branding services, namely, consulting, development, management and marketing of brands for business and/or individuals; marketing services; imaging services, namely, brand imagery consulting servicesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, songwriting services for advertising and non-advertising purposes, publishing of music, songs, and compositions, recording studio services, production of sound and musical video recordings, and record and video mastering; entertainment services, namely, post-production editing services in the field of music, videos, and film in the nature of mixing and sound engineering services; vocal training in the field of singing and spoken wordACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 17, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 30, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 30, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 30, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance