USPTO serial 86134479
ISONOVA TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISONOVA TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James H. Jeffries
JAMES H. JEFFRIES LATHROP & GAGE LLP910 E SAINT LOUIS ST STE 100SPRINGFIELD, MO 65806-2506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Proteins for use as ingredients in the manufacture of pet and animal feed, namely, egg protein, vegetable protein, meat protein, insect protein, larvae protein, protein from legumes and protein extractions | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Dietary supplements for animals; nutraceuticals for animals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Isonova Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Isonova Technologies LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ISONOVA TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 14, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 14, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 27, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 20, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |