USPTO serial 86134635
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical equipment for the purpose of delivering oxygen or humidified air for medical purposes; respiratory apparatus and instruments, namely, positive pressure devices for the diagnosis and treatment of sleep disordered breathing; humidification apparatus for medical use; medical apparatus and instruments for bi-level therapy for the treatment of respiratory conditions; medical apparatus and equipment for the treatment of respiratory diseases and conditions; medical apparatus in the nature of breathing tubes used in the delivery of air and gases to and away from patients; facial masks, oral masks, nasal masks, headgear, all being for medical purposes; parts and fittings for all the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |