Drawing for IMARKET360

USPTO serial 86134658

IMARKET360

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMARKET360?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta L. Christensen

ROBERTA L. CHRISTENSEN KOLEY JESSEN P.C., L.L.O.1125 S 103RD ST STE 800OMAHA, NE 68124-1079UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) provider featuring software that enables corporate and local marketers, field sales, and marketing partners to create, store, localize, manage and measure marketing communications across various channelsACTIVEOct 14, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2015MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 26, 2015ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 23, 2015EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 2, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance