Drawing for PHOENIX JR. COYOTES

USPTO serial 86134808

PHOENIX JR. COYOTES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, DONALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHOENIX JR. COYOTES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Laureanti

STEVEN J LAUREANTI JACKSON WHITE PC40 N CENTER ST STE 200MESA, AZ 85201-7300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment in the nature of ice hockey games; entertainment services, namely, providing ice hockey teams and tournamentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 8, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 8, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 24, 2016EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 3, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 19, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 19, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 19, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 19, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 16, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 16, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance