Drawing for AESIS

USPTO serial 86134991

AESIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AESIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie C. VanDerZanden

Julie C. VanDerZanden PURE FISHING, INC.4201 6TH AVE SSEATTLE, WA 98108-1702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear, namely, waders for fishing; waterproof shoes for fishing; waterproof boots for fishing; bib overalls and bibs not of paper both for fishingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2014MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 14, 2014ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 13, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance