USPTO serial 86135090
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Saint-Hubert, Québec, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
JAMES R MENKER HOLLEY & MENKER, PAPO BOX 331937ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32233-1715UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Building materials, namely, concrete blocks, masonry stones, bricks, paving blocks, stone slabs, concrete slabs, and manufactured brick and stone masonry veneer for interior and exterior walls, floors and surfaces, patios, poolsides, driveways and retaining and decorative landscaping walls | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |