Drawing for Serial No. 86135151

USPTO serial 86135151

Serial No. 86135151

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 86135151?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jacqueline L. Patt

Jacqueline L. Patt Markery Law LLCP.O. Box 84150Gaithersburg, MD 20883-4150UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic newsletters in the field of animal and pet behavior, nutrition, training, lifestyle, health, news, facts and tipsACTIVE—
018Pet products, namely, leashes for animals; Pet products, namely, pet restraining devices consisting of harnesses; accessories for pet collars, namely, bows, pendants and bells as attachmentsACTIVE—
031Pet food and pet products, namely, pet treats, consumable pet chews; food for animalsACTIVE—
039Electronic storage of documents related to pet health informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 26, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 22, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 22, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 24, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 24, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 30, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 21, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 20, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 25, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 25, 2015DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2015ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 26, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 22, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 22, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 25, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 15, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 30, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 21, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 29, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 29, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 29, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 24, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 20, 2014PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 11, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 11, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 28, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 28, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 28, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 28, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 8, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 20, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance