USPTO serial 86135167
VIRTUAL STACKS SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 11, 2018
- Examiner
- ULRICH, NANCY G
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 702 means the registration is active, Section 8 was accepted, and a Section 15 declaration of incontestability was also accepted. Incontestability strengthens your rights by limiting certain challenges after five years of continuous use. Continue use in commerce and plan for the 10-year Section 8 and 9 renewal.
Need help with VIRTUAL STACKS SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Virtual Stacks Enterprise, LLC.
Coconut Grove, FL
Virtual Stacks Enterprise, LLC.
Lake Mary, FL
Virtual Stacks Enterprise, LLC.
Lake Mary, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jacques Meshell, Esq.
Jacques Meshell, Esq. JACQUES N. MESHELL, P.A.3669 PARK LNCOCONUT GROVE, FL 33133-6826United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Open cloud computing services, namely, open cloud hosting in the nature of scalable and interoperable hosting of computer software, Internet websites, internet web software applications, electronic databases, digital content and business computer software applications of others that are accessible via the Internet; Computer technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software and network problems by service and help desk services; Technical support services, namely, technical administration and management of servers for others and trouble shooting in the nature of diagnosing of computer server problems; Computer technology support services, namely, diagnosing of computer hardware problems as they relate to open cloud computing services, namely, open cloud hosting in the nature of scalable open cloud hosting of computer software, Internet websites, Internet web software applications, electronic databases, digital content, and business computer software applications of others that are accessible via the Internet; Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) featuring open standards computer software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying open cloud computing infrastructure services; Installation, configuration, and operation of computer software platforms for creating, managing, and deploying cloud computing infrastructure services | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Virtual Stacks Enterprise, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by Virtual Stacks Enterprise, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by Virtual Stacks Enterprise, LLC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIRTUAL STACKS SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2024 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2018 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2018 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2018 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2018 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 8, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |