Drawing for MAX CUSH

USPTO serial 86135254

MAX CUSH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAX CUSH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alisa C. Simmons and John M. Naber

ALISA C. SIMMONS AND JOHN M. NABER FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY LLP120 S LASALLE ST STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Orthotic inserts for footwear; arch supports for boots or shoes; toe relief pads for orthopedic purposes; elastic loops for toes to relieve pain of overlapping toes; toe inserts for relieving bunion discomfort; and heel insert pads for orthopedic useACTIVE—
025Insoles; inserts for footwear for primarily non-orthopedic purposes; heel pads, insoles and inserts for footwear for cushioning and supporting the feet for primarily non-orthopedic purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 22, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 16, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance