USPTO serial 86135430
MUVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADEBAYO, OMOLAYO E.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MUVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Northbrook, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Martine
Peter Martine Martine Penilla Group LLP710 Lakeway Dr.Ste. 200Sunnyvale, CA 94085Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ASSISTANCE, ADVISORY SERVICES AND CONSULTANCY WITH REGARD TO BUSINESS PLANNING, BUSINESS ANALYSIS, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ORGANIZATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF DECISION SCIENCES; AND PUBLICATION OF ONLINE MAGAZINE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, RESEARCH AND DESIGN IN THE FIELD OF DECISION SCIENCES; INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTWARE TOOLS AND FRAMEWORKS FOR THE USE OF ANALYTICS TO SOLVE BUSINESS PROBLEMS BASED ON DATA ANALYSIS IN THE FIELD OF DECISION SCIENCES; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 13, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 29, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |