Drawing for CROWNJEWLZ

USPTO serial 86135742

CROWNJEWLZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURNS, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROWNJEWLZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ted Sabety

733 Third Avenue, 15th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Sets of boxes of cardboard or paper sold empty; desktop organizers; dry erase writing boards; highlighter pens; pencils; agendas; binder clips; account books; photo albums; bookmarks; paper weights; binders; address books; business cards; blank formsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2017EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2017EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 4, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 3, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 3, 2017EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2017IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2017INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Apr 12, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2017EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 12, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2016EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2016EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 5, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2016NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 12, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 15, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 10, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 3, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 3, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 6, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 3, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 10, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 27, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 25, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2014GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2014GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Mar 25, 2014EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Mar 25, 2014CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 9, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance