USPTO serial 86135934
RECCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RECCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Natalya L. Rose
NATALYA L. ROSE MILOM HORSNELL CROW ROSE KELLEY PLC3310 W END AVE STE 610NASHVILLE, TN 37203-6875UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for use in generating on-line marketing programs; Providing temporary use of on-line, non-downloadable software for analyzing and reporting on the effectiveness of website and electronic mobile device marketing; Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for tracking website activity and managing, monitoring, tracking and optimizing the performance and effectiveness of on-line and electronic mobile device marketing campaigns; Providing a website that enables tracking of consumer transaction receipts, invoices, and warranty information; Providing a website that enables tracking and management of loyalty coupon and loyalty programs; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for creating and forwarding receipts and warranty information; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software in the fields of retail sales and consumer transactions that enables generating, storing, forwarding and cataloging electronic receipts, sales transaction information, warranty information, notifications, reports and shopping lists; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for management of an on-line database in the field of retail sales transaction processing that enables uploading of transactional data, provides statistical analysis, and produces notifications and reports; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software that enables users to analyze, report and manage sales information and purchasing information; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for accessing, printing, exporting and managing stored retail receipts, coupons, notifications, reports and shopping lists; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for storing information about customers' purchasing history; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use by retail store operators to evaluate and track financial performance, customer services performance, customer and consumer information, coupon activity, purchase history, return history, and available rewards; Application service provider (ASP) provider services featuring software for use in tracking data generated by consumers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |