Drawing for OLIVIA & MARINO

USPTO serial 86136030

OLIVIA & MARINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLIVIA & MARINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam K Sacharoff

ADAM K SACHAROFF MUCH SHELIST, PC191 N WACKER DR STE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; Flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, bread substitutes and other bread products, namely, cereal bars, breakfast cereals, crackers, breadsticks, rusks; Snacks made from cereals, namely, cereal based snack food; Biscuits, pastry and confectionery made of sugar; Chocolate and chocolate-based products or products containing chocolate, namely, chocolate cakes, chocolate bars, chocolate pastries; Bakery products; Snacks and sweet snacks, namely, snack cakes; Preparations for making cakes, namely, cake mixes; Pizzas and preparations for pizzas, namely, pizza crust mixes, pizza sauce, frozen and fresh pizza crust, and kits comprised of ingredients for preparing pizza; Ice-cream; Honey; Treacle; Yeast; Baking-powder; Salt; Mustard; Vinegar; Sauces; Spices; and IceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 14, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 16, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 16, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 15, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 23, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 23, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 2013AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 19, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2013PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance