USPTO serial 86136349
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $425
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ellen Reilly
Ellen Reilly REILLY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW FIRM1888 N. Sherman Street, Suite 200DENVER, CO 80203UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | air conditioners, refrigerators, water coolers, evaporative air coolers, thermoelectric air cooling apparatus, not being vehicle engine parts, and chemical air cooling apparatus, not being vehicle engine parts, of all sizes for use in apartments, homes, offices and for use in industrial and commercial buildings of all sizes, and for use in automobiles, rail cars, shipping containers, cargo ships and tankers, recreational vehicles, boats and motor homes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2025 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2020 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 4, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |