USPTO serial 86138010
REAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Malvern, PA
Malvern, PA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Trail mix consisting primarily of minimally processed fruit and nuts, vegetables, hemp, chia, and other edible seeds, and secondarily grains, beans, cocoa beans, natural flavoring, herbs, and spices; Fruit- and nut-based snack foods in powdered and granular form consisting primarily of dried and ground fruits and nuts, also including vegetables, hemp, chia, and other edible seeds, and secondarily grains, beans, cocoa beans, natural flavoring, herbs, and spices; Processed fruit- and nut-based food bars consisting primarily of fruit and nuts, also including vegetables, hemp, chia, and other edible seeds, and secondarily grains, beans, cocoa beans, natural flavoring, herbs, and spices; Individually packaged and processed or dried foods and snacks, namely, dried vegetables, fruits, processed nuts, nut butters, and processed edible seeds; Hemp powdered milk used as a milk substitute; Potato chips; Processed potatoes and other vegetables cooked with coconut oil; Edible oils and fats; Milk substitute beverages, using powders of one or more of coconut, coconut milk, soy, almond, or hemp; Food beverages based on fruit or algae or vegetables; Hemp milk used as a milk substitute; Processed edible seeds, namely, hemp seed and chia; Fruit and vegetable purees used as ingredients in beverages | ABANDONED | Mar 21, 2013 |
| 030 | Granola and granola bars, consisting of processed oats, other grains, processed nuts, and secondarily processed vegetables, fruits, hemp, chia, and other edible seeds, beans, cocoa beans, natural flavoring, herbs, and spices; Ready to eat cereal derived food bars also containing processed vegetables, fruits, hemp, chia, and other edible seeds, grains, beans, cocoa beans, natural flavoring, herbs, and spices; Cocoa powder for foods and beverages; Chocolate powder for foods and beverages; Flavorings for foods or beverages: Tea-based beverages; Grain-based beverages; Flavorings for beverages other than essential oils; Chocolate-based beverages, Coffee-based beverages; Kombucha tea; Tea; Coffee; Individually packaged processed whole grains; Flavor coated popcorn with or without dried vegetables, fruits, nuts, seeds, herbs, and spices; Prepackaged, dried un-popped popcorn kernels; Corn Chips; Cookies; Candy; Pita Chips; Dried spices and herbs | ABANDONED | Mar 21, 2013 |
| 032 | Beverages, namely, fruit beverages and vegetable juice; Soft drinks, namely, natural sodas; Sports drinks; Energy drinks; Beverages with herbs and plant and synthetic stimulants, namely, vegetable juice, fruit juice; Aerated water; Aerated fruit juices; Fruit-flavored beverages; Soy-based beverages not being used as a milk substitutes; Hemp, almond, coconut-based beverages not used as milk substitutes; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; Water beverages, namely, mineral, bottled, spring, aerated, non-aerated, soda, tonic, flavored, seltzer, aerated, quinine and drinking water; Fruit based beverages with or without flavoring; Vegetable juices with or without flavoring; Isotonic drinks; Coconut water beverages with and without flavor extracts; Syrups for beverages; fruit juice concentrates; powders used in the preparation of fruit-based beverages; Essences for use in making soft drinks; Non-alcoholic apple cider; Non-alcoholic aperitifs and non-alcoholic beer; Non-alcoholic cocktail mixes; Non-alcoholic cocktails; Whey beverages and syrups for making whey-based beverages; Beer; Beer- based coolers; Beer-based cocktails | ABANDONED | Nov 20, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 29, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |