USPTO serial 86138144
ELITE RACE SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELITE RACE SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Leffman
DAVID L. LEFFMAN GORDON DAVIS JOHNSON & SHANE P.C.4695 N MESA STEL PASO, TX 79912-6150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, namely, paper signs, posters, business cards, letterhead, books in the field of athletic sport competitions for humans, newsletters featuring athletic sport competitions for humans, manuals relating to athletic sport competitions for humans, informational cards featuring athletic sport competitions for humans, business forms in the nature of applications, paper banners, vinyl banners, fabric banners, informational flyers, coasters and cup holders; printed matter, namely, paper signs, posters, business cards, books, newsletters, manuals, informational cards, applications, business forms, banners, flyers, coasters and cup holders; bookbinding material; photographs; stationery; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; artists' materials, namely, photographs of events, participants, book covers and stationery; printed instructional and teaching material in the field of human athletic competitions; playing cards; printers' type; printing blocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweat pants, sweat shirts, jackets, rain jackets, shell jackets, wind pants, water proof pants, shorts, sweat bands, gloves, footwear, headgear, namely, hats, caps, head bands, earmuffs | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, toy flying discs, basketballs, golf balls, sports balls, board games, card games, toy models; gymnastic and sporting articles namely, ropes, ladders, rings, cones, speed ladders, jump ropes, weight lifting equipment in the nature of weight lifting machines and barbells, weight lifting benches; decorations for Christmas trees | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education, namely, mentoring, tutoring, classes, seminars, workshops in the field of human competition sports and maintenance of physical condition or stamina; providing of training in the field of human competition sports; entertainment, namely, competitive human sporting activities involving timed competitions and human sporting races involving overcoming natural and manmade objects; organizing community sporting and cultural events | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ELITE RACE SERIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ELITE RACE SERIES LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ELITE RACE SERIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |