USPTO serial 86138495
WEAPONX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEAPONX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WeaponX Performance Products Ltd.
Sault Ste Marie, Ontar, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Peckham
DEBORAH PECKHAM BURNS & LEVINSON LLP125 SUMMER ST STE 800BOSTON, MA 02110-1624UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automotive parts and accessories, namely engine coils, ignition coils, ignition boosters, electronic ignitions, spark plugs, spark plug wires, ignition wires, ignition modules, ignition devices for motors for land vehicles, spark plug connectors, gaskets for internal combustion engines, engine seals, ignition condensors, electric fans for engines | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2006 |
| 037 | Automobile engine tuning services; automotive upgrade services, namely, supercharging, turbocharging and performance upgrades of automobiles; automobile customization services; automobile engine calibration services; rebuilding and repair of automobile engines | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2006 |
| 042 | Engineering design services; engineering services in the fields of automotive parts and accessories and custom automobile engine design and calibration; diagnostic testing of automobile engines | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 28, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |