Drawing for ALLSEEN

USPTO serial 86138692

ALLSEEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAL, KAMAL SINGH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALLSEEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yvonne E. Tingleaf

Yvonne E. Tingleaf Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.1211 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 1500Portland, OR 97204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for enabling, monitoring and controlling communications between processors and processor architectures; computer software to enable peer-to-peer (P2P) communications; computer software to enable electronic devices to discover, and connect and interact with, other electronic devices; computer software, namely, testing software for establishing conformance to specific technical specifications in the field of device connectivity and interoperabilityACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer software for communications between processors and processor architectures and for peer-to-peer (P2P) communications; developing voluntary common industry standards for the interoperability of electronic devices; design and development of computer hardware; design and development of computer network protocols; consultancy in the field of computer software for purposes of encouraging computer networking innovation; consultancy in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware for purposes of encouraging computer networking innovationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 10, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2016COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 29, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 27, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 27, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 27, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 28, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 8, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 24, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance