USPTO serial 86139229
STAKKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STAKKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Preston, Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl L. Burbach
CHERYL L. BURBACH HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN ST STE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210-1697UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | (Based on Intent to Use) Footwear(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |