USPTO serial 86139281
VITAGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VITAGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Chesal
MICHAEL B. CHESAL PERETZ CHESAL & HERRMANN, P.L.2 S BISCAYNE BLVD STE 3700MIAMI, FL 33131-1818UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric cooking utensils for domestic use, namely, stand mixers, electric juice extractors, blenders; electric juicers; electric hand mixers for kitchen use | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | microwave ovens for cooking, electric toasters, electric toaster ovens, electric cooking ovens, electric slow cookers, electric rice cookers, electric waffle irons, electric coffee makers, electric grills, charcoal grill barbeques and gas grill barbeques | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |