USPTO serial 86139488
DRS. DNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRS. DNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emilia F. Cannella
EMILIA F. CANNELLA ROPES & GRAY LLPPRUDENTIAL TOWER 800 BOYLSTON STBOSTON, MA 02199UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Facial cleansers; cosmetic sunscreen preparations; pre-moistened cosmetic wipes; cosmetics and make-up; lip gloss; facial concealers; shaving preparations; anti-aging cleanser; anti-aging cream; fragrances; hair care preparations; hair color; Shower and bath gel; body and beauty care cosmetics; soaps; deodorant for personal use; facial moisturizers; facial day cream and night cream; body moisturizer; non-medicated skin care creams and lotions; cosmetic facial blotting papers; cosmetic bags sold filled with facial cleansers, cosmetic sunscreen preparations, pre-moistened cosmetic wipes, cosmetics and make-up, lip gloss, facial concealers, shaving preparations, anti-aging cleanser, anti-aging cream, fragrances, hair care preparations, hair color, shower and bath gel, body and beauty care cosmetics, soaps, deodorant for personal use, facial moisturizers, facial day cream and night cream, body moisturizer, non-medicated skin care creams and lotions, and cosmetic facial blotting papers | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Medicated facial cleansers; medicated sunscreen; medicated pre-moistened wipes; acne treatment preparations; medicated make-up, namely, make-up containing acne treatment preparations; medicated lip gloss; medicated shaving preparations; medicated anti-aging facial cleanser; medicated anti-aging facial cream; medicated hair care preparations; medicated shower and bath gel; medicated body and beauty care cosmetics; medicated soaps; medicated deodorants for personal use; medicated facial moisturizers; medicated facial day cream and night cream; medicated body moisturizer; medicated skin care creams and lotions; cosmetic bags sold filled with medicated facial cleansers, medicated sunscreen, medicated pre-moistened wipes, acne treatment preparations, medicated make-up, namely, make-up containing acne treatment preparations, medicated lip gloss, medicated shaving preparations, medicated anti-aging cleanser, medicated anti-aging cream, medicated hair care preparations, medicated shower and bath gel, medicated body and beauty care cosmetics, medicated soaps, medicated deodorants for personal use, medicated facial moisturizers, medicated day cream and night cream, medicated body moisturizer, and non-medicated skin care creams and lotions | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Razors; Shaving cases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by drsDNA, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by drsDNA, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named DRS. DNA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |