USPTO serial 86140200
STILLWATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRER PEREZ, PAUL ANTHONY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STILLWATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shane Popp
SHANE M POPP THE LAW OFFICE OF SHANE M POPP3460 BARRY AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90066-2002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, women's shirts, sweatshirts, dresses, pants, and suits | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 2017 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 2017 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 20, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 28, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2016 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2016 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 4, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 4, 2016 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 3, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 25, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |