USPTO serial 86141199
RFAXIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RFAXIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BENJAMIN N. DIEDERICH
SHUNSUKE S. SUMITANI STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISESTE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656-2681Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | integrated circuits for use in wireless communication devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |