Drawing for AUTOMATION FRONTIER

USPTO serial 86141319

AUTOMATION FRONTIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOMATION FRONTIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Celia H. Leber

CELIA H. LEBER LEBER PATENT LAW P.C.4 Laurel RoadLynnfield, MA 01940UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable databases in the field of automation statisticsACTIVE—
035Analysis of market research data and statistics; Business information services, namely, providing an online compilation of annual employment data and statistics for the United States' high-tech industry; Business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, sales, operation, product design particularly specializing in the use of analytic and statistic models for the understanding and predicting of consumers, businesses, and market trends and actions; Compilation of statistics; Compiling and analyzing statistics, data and other sources of information for business purposes; Economic consulting and information for the industrial and commercial sectors for planning, organizing, monitoring and carrying out unique and complex projects in different sectors of one or several companies; Economic forecasting and analysis; Providing information and analysis in the fields of economics and business; Providing information and news in the field of business, namely, information and news on current events and on economic, legislative, and regulatory developments as it relates to and can impact businesses; Providing statistical information; Research and analysis in the fields of economics and economic policy; Statistical analysis and reporting services for business purposesACTIVE—
036Financial analysis, namely, compiling and analyzing statistics, data and other sources of information for financial purposesACTIVE—
042Consulting services in the field of office and workplace automationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 28, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 4, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 1, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 25, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 25, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 8, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 31, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 26, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 14, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance