USPTO serial 86141771
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hampshire P09 1SA, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Ehrlich
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer storage devices, namely, high-speed storage systems incorporating hard disks, for storage and backup of electronic data, and computer software for controlling and administering the said computer storage devices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |