USPTO serial 86142198
PIZZZE ITALIA QUALITÀ CON GUSTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROMER, ZACHARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIZZZE ITALIA QUALITÀ CON GUSTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
LEO M. LOUGHLIN ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC607 14TH ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-2005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, COCOA AND ARTIFICIAL COFFEE; RICE, COOKED RICE, RISOTTO; TAPIOCA AND SAGO; FLOUR AND PREPARATIONS MADE FROM CEREALS, NAMELY, CEREAL BARS, CEREAL BASED SNACK FOOD; BREAD, FLAT BREAD, BREAD DOUGHS AND BREAD STICKS, BUNS, PRETZELS, CRACKERS, QUICHE, PIZZA, PIZZA CRUST, PIZZA CRUST MIXES, PIZZA DOUGH, SANDWICHES, CHEESEBURGER SANDWICHES, HAMBURGER SANDWICHES, HOT DOG SANDWICHES, BURGERS CONTAINED IN BREAD ROLLS; PASTRY, NAMELY, ALIMENTARY PASTE, FILLED PASTA, FRESH PASTA, PASTA SALAD, PASTRY DOUGH, PASTRIES, MACARONI, RAVIOLI, SPAGHETTI; CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY BAKERY DESSERTS, BAKERY GOODS, MIXES FOR BAKERY GOODS, BISCUITS; BISCUITS MIXES, CAKES, CANDIES, CHEESECAKES, PLUM-CAKES, RICE CAKES, CHOCOLATE AND CHOCOLATES, CREPES, FROZEN CONFECTIONERY; ICES; SUGAR, HONEY, TREACLE; YEAST, BAKING-POWDER; SALT; MUSTARD; VINEGAR, SAUCES, NAMELY, SEASONINGS MIXES, STEAK SEASONINGS, FOOD SEASONINGS, FOOD FLAVORINGS, GRAVIES, GRILLING SAUCE; SPICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | SERVICES FOR PROVIDING FOOD AND DRINK, TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION, NAMELY, ACCOMMODATION BUREAUS BEING HOTELS AND BOARDING HOUSES; HOTELS; BAR SERVICES; CAFES; CAFETERIAS; CANTEEN SERVICES; RENTAL OF COOKING APPARATUS; RENTAL OF CHAIRS, TABLES, TABLE LINEN, GLASSWARE; BOARDING HOUSES; RESTAURANT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PIZZERIAS; RESTAURANTS; RESTAURANT SERVICES; SELF-SERVICE RESTAURANTS; CATERING OF FOOD AND DRINK; FAST FOOD RESTAURANT SERVICES; TAKE OUT RESTAURANT SERVICES; MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR RESTAURANTS AND MEALS; PROVISION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO RESTAURANTS; SNACK BARS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2014 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |