USPTO serial 86142412
CYCLOPS; CYBER CLOUD OPERATIONAL PAYLOADS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYCLOPS; CYBER CLOUD OPERATIONAL PAYLOADS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brookeville, MD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM (sUAS) PAYLOADS; SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE FOR SMALL UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEM PAYLOADS FOR COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY, SIGNALS TECHNOLOGY, RADAR TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY, ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGY, CHEMICAL RADIOLOGICAL BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY, RADIATION TECHNOLOGY, WAKE DETECTION TECHNOLOGY, CYBER SECURITY TECHNOLOGY, CYBER TECHNOLOGY, CLOUD TECHNOLOGY, CLOUD ENVIRONMENT TECHNOLOGY, VIDEO TECHNOLOGY, RADIO FREQUENCY TECHNOLOGY, DIRECTION FINDING TECHNOLOGY, THERMAL TECHNOLOGY, CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, OVER-THE-AIR TECHNOLOGY, WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, SECURITY TECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY, AND COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2015 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |