Drawing for BUD TASTE ENHANCER

USPTO serial 86142427

BUD TASTE ENHANCER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUD TASTE ENHANCER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David R. Welch

David R. Welch DR Welch, Attorneys at Law500 S. Grand AvenueSuite 1800Los Angeles, CA 90071

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001hydroponic nutrients for plant growthACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 6, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2018FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
May 18, 2018ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
May 11, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 7, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 18, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 16, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 11, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 12, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 29, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 11, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 11, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 21, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 7, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 6, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 6, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 6, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 31, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance