Drawing for PARALLEL COMPUTING SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 86142501

PARALLEL COMPUTING SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4661240Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 23, 2014
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARALLEL COMPUTING SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ruth Rivard

RUTH RIVARD STINSON LEONARD STREET150 SOUHT FIFTH STREETSUITE 2300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for parallel computing, database management, and data management; Computer software for parallel computing, database management, and data managementSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDOct 15, 2013
042Consulting in the field of information technology; Information technology consulting services; Planning, design and management of information technology systems; Technical support services, namely, remote administration and management of in-house and hosted datacenter devices, databases and software applications; Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and servicesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDOct 15, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2016C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Oct 15, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 10, 2016C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Oct 10, 2016ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2016TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Oct 7, 2016CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 7, 2016CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Dec 22, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2015PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 23, 2014R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Nov 18, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2014AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2014CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 13, 2014IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 11, 2014AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 11, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 10, 2014EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 12, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance