USPTO serial 86142912
O
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with O?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle L. Grenier, Esq.
MICHELLE L. GRENIER, ESQ. GRENIER LAW OFFICES, PC225 FRANKLIN ST FL 26BOSTON, MA 02110-2853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for use with computers, tablet computers, interactive whiteboards, wireless devices, mobile devices and handheld devices for connecting remote users to interactive and non-interactive educational lectures, seminars, training, workshops, webinars, courses, course materials and educational testing services online; Downloadable software for computers, tablet computers, interactive whiteboards, wireless devices, mobile devices and handheld devices, for connecting remote users to interactive and non-interactive educational lectures, seminars, training, workshops, webinars, courses, course materials and educational testing; Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of newsletters, brochures, downloadable webinars, reference guides, reports, studies, e-books, online magazines, online newspapers, electronic journals, e-zines recorded on computer media, training manuals, journals, memoranda, instructional materials, workbooks, articles, online testing materials in the nature of publications, namely, study guides, books containing practice tests for end-users, reports, research reports, books containing interactive and non-interactive tests for testing end-users in the field of business development, marketing, business communication, business promotion, advertising and social media; Educational software featuring instruction in business development, marketing, business communication, business promotion, advertising and social media; all of the foregoing in the field of business development, marketing, business communication, business promotion, advertising and social media, specifically excluding publishing and entertainment goods and services on the subjects of science fiction, fantasy, fiction, and nonfiction related to science-fiction and nonfiction related to fantasy-fiction | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 6, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2016 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 6, 2016 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 20, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |