USPTO serial 86143205
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Altos, CA
Los Altos, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark E. Miller
MARK E. MILLER O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTRFL 28SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3903| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business incubation services for early stage companies in the fields of information technology including mobile applications and hardware solutions, namely, business marketing, business management, and business development services in the form of start-up support for businesses of others; Business incubation services for early stage companies in the fields of information technology including mobile applications and hardware solutions, namely, providing business communications services in the nature of public relations, advertising, marketing and publicity services; Business incubation services for early stage companies in the fields of information technology including mobile applications and hardware solutions, namely, business consultation services in the fields strategic planning, operations and general management, information technology, business leadership development and business management, providing technical and market expertise; Business incubation services for early stage companies in the fields of information technology including mobile applications and hardware solutions, namely, business consultation services in the field of start-up business counseling, marketing and planning; business networking services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Facilitating funding for start-up and growing businesses, namely, providing financial consultation services in the field of venture capital consultation; Facilitating funding for start-up and growing businesses, namely, providing financing to start-ups and emerging businesses | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, providing training programs in the field of business, specifically, training on how to develop, manage and operate an emerging or start-up company; education services, namely, mentoring in the field of business; and educational services, namely, arranging and conducting networking seminars in the field of business | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Business incubation services for early stage companies in the fields of information technology including mobile applications and hardware solutions, namely, product development in the field of information technology products; Business incubation services for early stage companies in the fields of information technology including mobile applications and hardware solutions, namely, providing facilities for research and development space; Business incubation services for early stage companies in the fields of information technology including mobile applications and hardware solutions, namely, providing technical support in the nature of troubleshooting of computer software problems and diagnosing computer hardware problems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | EPEN | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 22, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |