USPTO serial 86143373
BLD'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLD'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | bar and restaurant services | ABANDONED | Oct 30, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | CU.M | CONCURRENT USE DISSOLVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | CU.M | CONCURRENT USE DISSOLVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2020 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 19, 2018 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |